Jonathan Mills

iPhone 2.0 Worldwide Launch on June 9th | Gadget Lab from Wired.com:

A June 9 launch date for the iPhone 2? No surprises there, and now it looks like inside sources are confirming the June 9 date, which is also when Steve Jobs’ keynote at Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference is scheduled.
But Gizmodo’s Jesus Diaz has got wind of the details of the launch, and his source tells him that the Second Coming will be a worldwide event — not just in the United States. He also claims that his snitch, “someone very, very close to the 3-G iPhone launch”, says that the current fixed pricing model will be discontinued in favor of a more Euro-friendly flexible price point, one that can shift subject to the markets and the whims of the telcos.
The last point concerns Spain. As we reported this morning, Telefónica will indeed carry the iPhone, and will be launching it along with its brand new Madrid megastore on June 18.

Via Wired.com

Does RAID 0+1 instead of RAID 10. Really? Seriously?

I was contemplating ordering one of these with a Mac Pro because I wanted to use it in RAID 10. RAID 10 is a stripe (RAID 0) across two or more mirrored pairs (RAID 1). Conversely, RAID 0+1 is a mirror across two or more striped pairs. But as the manual clearly states, it doesn’t do RAID 10. It does RAID 0+1, and that’s not so good.
 
There are dramatic differences between these two configurations:

• Chances of array failure:
  

  “Mathematically, the difference is that the chance of system failure with two drive failures in a RAID 0+1 system with two sets of drives is (n/2)/(n - 1) where n is the total number of drives in the system. The chance of system failure in a RAID 1+0 system with two drives per mirror is 1/(n - 1). So, using the 8 drive systems shown in the diagrams, the chance that losing a second drive would bring down the RAID system is 4/7 with a RAID 0+1 system and 1/7 with a RAID 1+0 system.”

• Performance in degraded state:
  

  Another difference between the two RAID configurations is performance when the system is in a degraded state, i.e. after it has lost one or more drives but has not lost the right combination of drives to completely fail. In a RAID 0+1 configuration, the loss of any drive in a set causes the failure of that entire set and the set is removed from the RAID system. Generally (in the two set case) this means you are left with a RAID 0 system made up of the remaining set of disks. This probably slightly improves write performance and slightly degrades read performance (but that’s just a WAG, I haven’t done any testing). In a RAID 1+0 system, you would see the same effect on each mirror that loses a drive, but not the whole system. In other words, a RAID 1+0 configuration will tend to show similar, but less dramatic, changes in performance when in a degraded mode than RAID 0+1.

• Recovery once a disk is replaced:
  

  RAID 1+0 only has to re-mirror one drive, whereas RAID 0+1 has to re-mirror the entire failed set. So RAID 1+0 will recover significantly faster.

Given these pretty significant failings of RAID 0+1 as compared to RAID 10, it’s a pretty good question as to why Apple would choose the much poorer option for its ‘Pro’ RAID card, for which it charges $720. I’m just really left scratching my head.

Shame on you Apple, shame!

Time Capsule teardown:

Filed under: Wireless, Apple

Apple’s Time Capsule hasn’t even been shipping for a week yet, and Flickr user “nakedmac” has already dissected his Time Capsule. What may be surprising is that the Time Capsule is no more than an Airport Extreme with a hard drive. But remember when Steve said that the Time Capsule would feature a “server-grade hard drive?” Well, it features a Hitachi Deskstar hard drive. According to the Typical Mac User Podcast blog, the Hitachi hard drive isn’t necessarily rated for “server-grade.”

Via The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)

(more…)